Research hotspots and trends in the field of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association Classification System at home and abroad based on CiteSpace
Shen Luxia1, Gao Yingli2, Wang Yan3, Shi Zhongli3
1Department of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China; 2Department of Nursing, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, China; 3Department of Nursing, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China
摘要目的探讨基于可视化分析方法的国内外北美护理诊断分类系统（NANDA）领域的研究热点及研究趋势。方法检索在中国知识资源总库（CNKI）、中文科技期刊数据库（VIP）、中国学术期刊数据库（万方数据）中1981年1月至2022年5月收录的有关护理诊断的中文文献，在Web of Science中检索1973年1月至2022年5月收录的有关护理诊断的英文文献，应用文献计量学方法和CiteSpace软件对相关文献的年发文量、期刊、作者、机构和关键词等进行统计分析。结果共纳入中文文献487篇，英文文献494篇，中文文献发文量高峰处于1999～2003年，英文文献自2008年-至今发文量呈现稳步上升趋势。国内发文作者、机构间合作性较差，国外作者、机构间合作网络较密切。中英文文献关键词分析，研究主题集中在临床应用研究、NANDA应用方法研究和护理教学研究。国外研究热点集中于提出新的护理诊断及内容效度验证方面，我国研究热点聚焦于NANDA的应用推广、应用现状分析和护理诊断术语体系的本土化研究。结论国外护理诊断的研究相对比较成熟，可为我国护理诊断研究提供借鉴。建议我国未来应加强各地区作者和机构之间的合作与交流，并进一步细化和深入研究内容，开展更高质量的研究。
Abstract：ObjectiveTo explore the research hotspots and trends in the field of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Classification System at home and abroad based on visual analysis methods. MethodsChinese literatures on nursing diagnosis included in CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases from January 1981 to May 2022 were searched, and English literatures included in Web of Science from January 1973 to May 2022 were retrieved. Using bibliometrics and CiteSpace software, statistical analysis were made on the number of publications, journals, authors, institutions and keywords of relevant literatures. ResultsA total of 487 Chinese literatures and 494 English literatures were included. The peak of the number of Chinese literature was in 1999-2003, and the amount of English literatures published from 2008 to the present showed a steady upward trend. The cooperation between domestic authors and institutions was poor, while the cooperation network between foreign authors and institutions was close. Keywords analysis of Chinese and English literatures showed that research topics focus on clinical application research, NANDA applied method research and nursing teaching research. Foreign research hotspots lied in proposing new nursing diagnosis and content validity verification, and Chinese research hotspots focused on the application promotion, application status analysis of NANDA and localization of nursing diagnostic terminology system. ConclusionsThe research of nursing diagnosis abroad is relatively mature, which can provide reference for the research of nursing diagnosis in China. It is suggested that cooperation and communication between authors and institutions in different regions should be strengthened in the future, and the research content should be further refined and deepened to carry out higher quality research.
申鲁霞1高英莉2王妍3时忠丽3 . 基于CiteSpace的国内外北美护理诊断分类系统领域的研究热点及趋势分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(4): 274-279.
Shen Luxia1, Gao Yingli2, Wang Yan3, Shi Zhongli3. Research hotspots and trends in the field of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association Classification System at home and abroad based on CiteSpace. zhzdx, 2022, 10(4): 274-279.
